Arkansas
Category
Title or Name of APCD System
- Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database
Who Maintains the System
- ACHI administers the APCD with support and oversight from the Health Insurance Rate Review Division (HIRRD) at the Arkansas Insurance Department (AID)
Legal Authority
First Year APCD Collected Data
- 2013
APCD Snapshot
- All paid claims for 2013-Q1 2017
Number of Commercial Sources of Claims Data
- 60
Covered Lives
- 7 million
Sources and Status of APCD Data Collection
Payers
Commercial Payers
- Currently Collected
Third Party Administrators/Self-Funded
- Currently Collected
Medicaid
- Currently Collected
Medicare
- Currently Collected
Other
- Arkansas State Employee Benefits Division and Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission
Types of Data Collected
Medical Claims
- Currently Collected
Eligibility
- Currently Collected
Dental
- Currently Collected
Pharmacy
- Currently Collected
Workers' Compensation
- Currently Collected
Other
- Arkansas Employee Benefits Division
Primary Users/Uses
- State agency and health policy support.
Future Plans
- Opening to academic researchers.
State Specific Resources
Contact Information
For more information, please contact: support@achiapcd.atlassian.net
Use Cases from the APCD Showcase
Displaying 6 - 10 of 25
| Use Cases | Category | Carriers | |
|---|---|---|---|
This case study analyzes a decade of birth data in Arkansas to evaluate whether newborns receive care at the appropriate level of neonatal facility. It finds that triage decisions are driven more by geography than clinical need — only 20% of births occurred at risk-appropriate facilities, with over-triage dominating in well-resourced areas and under-triage concentrated in rural areas far from appropriate care. Medicaid-insured infants faced disproportionately higher rates of under-triage, and hospital closures worsened access further. The authors call for reconfiguring the regionalized perinatal system to better match neonatal care resources with actual clinical need. |
Population Health, Researchers | Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare | |
This case study evaluates the HIV care continuum in Arkansas, finding that HIV testing, engagement, and retention in care are all below national averages, with particularly worse outcomes among rural residents and women. The authors recommend targeted interventions including expanded HIV testing, provider training, resource reallocation to high-burden communities, and telehealth expansion to reach those most in need. |
Medicaid, Population Health, Providers, Researchers | Commercial, Medicaid | |
This study quantifies a major shift in locus of VA critical care, a likely outcome of expanded non-VA health insurance coverage that was previously called out, but the study was not designed to address the many issues raised by outsourcing so much ICU care, including questions about the coordination and continuity of post-ICU care for these patients with high-acuity conditions. The study adds to concerns about VA’s ability to oversee the quality of community care and gaps in the integration of VA-delivered and VA-purchased care. |
Consumers, Health Reform, Medicaid, Population Health, Providers | Medicaid | |
This case study identified disparities in delay in breast cancer surgery persist across race, healthcare access, and community-level vulnerability. These findings underscore the need for strengthened support services and improved continuity of care among vulnerable populations. |
Consumers, Insurance Department, Medicaid, Population Health, Providers | Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare | |
This case study evaluated patterns of opioid purchases by payment source among pregnant women in Arkansas and examine their associations with adverse neonatal outcomes. |
Population Health, Providers, Researchers | Commercial |